Faf Du Plessis added new meaning to the phrase "finger lickin' good" when television footage emerged from the second test against Australia of him using saliva to vigorously shine the ball with a mint in his mouth.
Du Plessis was charged and found guilty of ball-tampering by the ICC. Despite footage conclusively establishing ball tampering, Du Plessis will appeal the verdict .
Du Plessis should reconsider and withdraw his appeal. The odds of a successful appeal are zero notwithstanding the statement from CSA's chief executive, speaking for Du Plessis: "In his mind Faf is clear that he did not alter the condition of the ball nor did he intend to do so . . . " Even so, it is irrelevant as to the question of guilt or innocence. The rule against tampering imposes strict liability on the offender irrespective of intent. The lack of intent is, however, material to the degree of punishment metered out.
It is not too late for Du Plessis to withdraw his appeal, and accept responsibility for violating the black and white rules on ball-tampering. By doing so, he will assuage the moral indignation of many followers of cricket who well know that his lapse in judgment "just isn't cricket".